El Rufai Fires Back At Oritsejafor, You Are An “Irresponsible” Leader
Category: Nigerian National News
Former minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nasir El-Rufai, who recently just declared his intention of running for the Governorship position in Kaduna, come 2015 has fired back at Pastor Oritsejafor for daring to say himself and APC spokesman, Lai Mohammed were only trying to tarnish his image when they called him out concerning a private jet which was recently impounded in South Africa over suspicion of arms smuggling.
Former minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nasir El-Rufai, who recently just declared his intention of running for the Governorship position in Kaduna, come 2015 has fired back at Pastor Oritsejafor for daring to say himself and APC spokesman, Lai Mohammed were only trying to tarnish his image when they called him out concerning a private jet which was recently impounded in South Africa over suspicion of arms smuggling.
El-Rufai described the CAN president as an “irresponsible”
leader and asked him to come out and tell Nigerians may be the same impounded jet
was the one ‘donated’ to him in 2012. He also said he should clarify if the jet
was actually registered as a commercial aircraft or the aircraft serves as both
private and commercial one.
Read the full statement has reported by Premium Times:
A former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, and
senior member of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Nasir El-Rufai, on
Wednesday described the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria, CAN,
Ayo Oritsejafor, as an “irresponsible” leader who has abused his revered office
by venturing into politics.
Mr. El-Rufai was reacting to a statement by CAN Tuesday
berating the former minister and the spokesperson of the APC, Lai Mohammed,
over their responses to reports that a private jet recently impounded in South
Africa over suspicion of arms smuggling, belongs to the CAN president. In the
statement, CAN accused the two APC stalwarts of tarnishing the image of Mr.
Ortisejafor.
CAN also said Mr. El-Rufai had once said there are three
sets of Boko Haram in Nigeria: “Islamic Boko Haram, Politicians’ Boko Haram and
Christians’ Boko Haram which he said are being funded by President Goodluck
Jonathan and coordinated by CAN President, Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor. He went
further to claim that the CAN President has been given N50 billion by the
President and a Jet”.
In his response Wednesday, Mr. El Rufai said the CAN
president is becoming “jittery” because his private jet was identified as the
vessel impounded by the South African authorities for ferrying $9.3m cash into
their country. Mr. El-Rufai also said after being unable to shake off his
connection to the plane, Mr. Oritsejafor has resorted to abuse and
vilification.
“Were he more reflective, he would be pondering how, of all
the private jets available in Nigeria, it was his that came to be involved in a
covert arms purchase scandal.
“Would he have managed any objectivity if the plane involved
happened to belong to a prominent person of another faith or political
persuasion,” a statement signed by Mr. El Rufai’s spokesperson, Muyiwa Adekeye,
said. Mr. El-Rufai also said the CAN President should explain if the jet
involved in the scandal is the same one that was “donated” to him in 2012.
“Did he register it as a commercial aircraft or is the plane
illegally moonlighting as one? Has he ever reflected on the impropriety of
mixing his religious role with politics? “Having strayed into politics, and an
irresponsible variant at that, can he expect the veneration enjoyed by his
predecessors such as Cardinals Olubunmi Okogie and John Onaiyekan?
“Why is he the first CAN leader to provoke pitiful mirth and
amusement when he is not being derided as a tragedy, a sort of Ichabod,
desperate to separate glory from a revered body?” Mr. El-Rufai said.
He also advised Mr. Oritsejafor to “look beyond the bling to
ask himself if it was any of the individuals he abused yesterday that asked him
to make his aircraft available for monkey business, or get himself involved in
the politics of division”.
No comments